Mar 5:30 Who touched my clothes?
Christ feels the power go out of him when the woman touches his clothing, seeking a cure for bleeding. The interesting implication of this statement is that the curing was not voluntary or conscious on the part of Christ. He was a conduit for power, but he did not consciously control the power. It was the woman's conscious actions not Christ's that triggered the release of power.
Christ uses clothing as a symbol for power. In several places in the NT, Christ identifies kings by their clothing. It is the outer symbol of their power as the body in the outer sign of the soul. However, here his clothing isn't an intellectual symbol of social power but a physical conduit of spiritual power. The power travels though the physical instead of through the word.
The implication here is that Christ's channeling of God was a physical function of his body not just a conscious function of his mind. His clothes become a channel as well simply because they touch his body. The woman received God's power, completing a circuit of power and need, by simply touching Christ's clothing.
In the previous mental healing of the possessed man, Christ transferred his power through his words, the symbol for mental realm. Christ also cure physical ailments by speaking words as he does with the lame man who he tells to pick up his bed and return home. However, here and several other places in the Gospels, we see Christ curing physical ills though physical contact as when he rubs the blind man's eyes with mud.
"Touched" is from haptomai, which means to "fasten to," "to adhere to," "to cling to," "to have intercourse with a woman," ""to touch" and "to assail."
"Clothes" is from himation (himation), which was an oblong piece of cloth worn as an outer garment. The term generally means "clothes" and "cloth."
Christ feels the power go out of him when the woman touches his clothing, seeking a cure for bleeding. The interesting implication of this statement is that the curing was not voluntary or conscious on the part of Christ. He was a conduit for power, but he did not consciously control the power. It was the woman's conscious actions not Christ's that triggered the release of power.
Christ uses clothing as a symbol for power. In several places in the NT, Christ identifies kings by their clothing. It is the outer symbol of their power as the body in the outer sign of the soul. However, here his clothing isn't an intellectual symbol of social power but a physical conduit of spiritual power. The power travels though the physical instead of through the word.
The implication here is that Christ's channeling of God was a physical function of his body not just a conscious function of his mind. His clothes become a channel as well simply because they touch his body. The woman received God's power, completing a circuit of power and need, by simply touching Christ's clothing.
In the previous mental healing of the possessed man, Christ transferred his power through his words, the symbol for mental realm. Christ also cure physical ailments by speaking words as he does with the lame man who he tells to pick up his bed and return home. However, here and several other places in the Gospels, we see Christ curing physical ills though physical contact as when he rubs the blind man's eyes with mud.
"Touched" is from haptomai, which means to "fasten to," "to adhere to," "to cling to," "to have intercourse with a woman," ""to touch" and "to assail."
"Clothes" is from himation (himation), which was an oblong piece of cloth worn as an outer garment. The term generally means "clothes" and "cloth."