Mat 25:24 Then he who had received the one talent came and said, Lord, I knew you that you are an hard man, reaping where you have not sown, and gathering where you have not strawed:
Alternative: Then the one who received a single talent came and said: "Master, I have learned that you are cruel man, harvesting where you have not planted and pinching from what you haven't harvested.
In the Greek, this comes across as even more critical than the English translation. While clearly a servant who thought this way wouldn't speak his mind this directly, Christ uses this servant to express a common viewpoint about successful people: that they are practically criminal because their ownership of property gives them the ability to profit from the labors of others.
While we tend to think that this analysis began with Marxist "analysis," like most ideas, it has been around since the beginning of civilization. This perception isn't modern in any sense of the word. It is rooted in the most primitive of all thoughts, coveting your neighbors goods, wanting what others have.
It is no coincidence that here Christ portrays this viewpoint as that of the least capable servant. Christ has already made the point that everyone can prosper if they work, no matter how great or small their abilities. Now, he looks at what he see as the key reason that incapable people use to avoid responsbility for their situation. These people don't see wealth (or poverty) as the result of the previous work and judgments. Since they do not want to work, they only see wealth only as a way that others escape from doing work.
In this whole analogy, Christ is preaching against this idea of making judgments based on a snapshot of a specific point in time without considering what has happened before to create that situation and after to resolve that situation.
Consider how this parable begins: the master allots resources and responsibilities based on his judgment of the capability of his servants. Though the story doesn't explain the source of the master's opinion of their capabilities, the story illustrates the source of the master's judgment. He (and everyone else) judges others by the results of their actions.
The least capable servant doesn't want to be judged on the basis of his actions. He wants an excuse not to act so that he is not judged. Nor does this servant see the world as the result of other's judgments of actions. He doesn't see the wealth of his master as the result of other's judgments about past actions. Instead the poor servant doesn't even think about the source of this wealth. For the poor servant, this wealth simply exists out of nothing, as a sort of injustice. From his attitude, we can guess that if pressed, he would simply say that all wealth comes from a prior theft of some type.
Nor does the poor servant think of managing wealth, that is, resources, successfully as productive work. He sees it as something akin to theft: getting a return on the work of others. The servant misses the entire point of his master's test. He doesn't recognize how his fellow servants worked with the resources that they were given. In making good decisions about how to use that money, those good servants have provided resources that others needed to be productive. In return, the good servants have justly shared in the rewards of that productivity and been rewarded for their good management.
Since the least capable servant doesn't see this decision-making as productive work, he blames his master's hardness and cruelty for the poor servant's decision not to work with what he was generously given. This servant ignores the clear evidence of his master's generosity, the sum of money that he was given. Instead this servant prefers to see the productive management of this money as a form of theft and cruelty: the taking of what others have produced.
The again raises the whole issue of the "problem of evil," which I discussed in the last chapter. What people see as suffering is often a "slide of time" problem. Here, the poor servant sees his master as "hard," overlooking the generosity of being given the opportunity and resources to improve himself. People who have a problem with suffering must first ignore the infinite debt we have from getting the gift of life. There is a sense of entitlement here. Not only do I want life, I want a life without any demands on me. Putting demands on others is somehow seen as cruel. This is just telling God that his gift isn't good enough. Seems kind of stupid to me.
"Knew" is from gignôskô (ginosko) which means "to learn to know," "to know by reflection or observation," and "to perceive."
"Hard" is from sklêros (skleros), which means "hard to the touch," "unyielding," "harsh," "bitter," "austere," "cruel," and "stubborn."
"Reaping" is from therizô (therizo), which means "to do summer work," "to reap," "to mow," "to cut off," and, in Asia, "to plunder."
"Sewn" is from speirô (speiro), which means "to sow a seed," "to beget offspring," "to scatter like a seed," and "to sow a field."
"Gathered" is from sunagô (sunago), which means "to bring together," "to gather together," "to unite," "to draw together," "to narrow," "to pinch," "to conclude," and "to prove."
"Strawed" is from diaskorpizô (diaskorpizo), which means "to scatter abroad," "to squander," "to confound," and "to winnow."